Acts of Disputation
Archelaus
Chapter 16
About this work
- Author
- Archelaus
Section 16
16. The judges said: Convertibility translates the person whom it
Opening the library…
Acts of Disputation
Archelaus
16. The judges said: Convertibility translates the person whom it
The text runs thus: “ut si dicamus, Judæus, si velit fieri Christianus, aut si Christianus velit esse gentilis, hæc species est convertibilitatis et causa.”
The text gives convertibiles. Routh suggests inconvertibiles, inconvertible.
The text is unum dicamus ingenitum. Routh suggests unum bonum, etc. = Why should we not speak of only one unbegotten good?
The text is, “quod si suis eum dicas extitisse malum, sine dubio ergo ostenditur illum bonæ esse naturæ.” Routh suggests, “quia istis suis adversatur qui mali sunt,” etc. = The fact that he is adverse to those who are of his own kin, and who are evil, would be a proof that he comes of a good nature.
Mark iii. 23.
Or, kin to it, vicinum habet interitum.
Mark iii. 27.
The text is, “creati hominis causa invenitur exstitisse malitiæ,” for which we read “creatio hominis,” etc.