Opening the library…
Home Bible Corpus Discover You
The Divine Institutes
Lactantius
Book 6 · Chapter 11 About this work A large Latin presentation of Christian teaching that criticizes pagan religion and philosophy while treating justice, God, creation, Christ, worship, ethics, and the final destiny of humanity.
Author Lactantius
Date c. AD 303–311
Origin North Africa and Nicomedia
Genre Apology Chap. XI.—Of the Persons Upon Whom a Benefit is to Be Conferred. Therefore humanity is to be preserved , if we
‹ Book 6 · Chapter 10 Book 6 · Chapter 12 ›
wish
rightly
to
be
called
men
.
But
what
else
is
this
preservation
of
humanity
than
the
loving
a
man
because
he
is
a
man
,
and
the
same
as
ourselves
?
Therefore
discord
and
dissension
are
not
in
accordance
with
the
nature
of
man
;
and
that
expression
of
Cicero
is
true
,
which
says
that
man
,
while
he
is
obedient
to
nature
,
cannot
injure
man
.
Therefore
,
if
it
is
contrary
to
nature
to
injure
a
man
,
it
must
be
in
accordance
with
nature
to
benefit
a
man
;
and
he
who
does
not
do
this
deprives
himself
of
the
title
of
a
man
,
because
it
is
the
duty
of
humanity
to
succour
the
necessity
and
peril
of
a
man
.
I
ask
,
therefore
,
of
those
who
do
not
think
it
the
part
of
a
wise
man
to
be
prevailed
upon
and
to
pity
,
If
a
man
were
seized
by
some
beast
,
and
were
to
implore
the
aid
of
an
armed
man
,
whether
they
think
that
he
ought
to
be
succoured
or
not
?
They
are
not
so
shameless
as
to
deny
that
that
ought
to
be
done
which
humanity
demands
and
requires
.
Also
,
if
any
one
were
surrounded
by
fire
,
crushed
by
the
downfall
of
a
building
,
plunged
in
the
sea
,
or
carried
away
by
a
river
,
would
they
think
it
the
duty
of
a
man
not
to
assist
him
?
They
themselves
are
not
men
if
they
think
so
;
for
no
one
can
fail
to
be
liable
to
dangers
of
this
kind
.
Yes
,
truly
,
they
will
say
that
it
is
the
part
of
a
human
being
,
and
of
a
brave
man
too
,
to
preserve
one
who
was
on
the
point
of
perishing
.
If
,
therefore
,
in
casualties
of
this
nature
which
imperil
the
life
of
man
,
they
allow
that
it
is
the
part
of
humanity
to
give
succour
,
what
reason
is
there
why
they
should
think
that
succour
is
to
be
withheld
if
a
man
should
suffer
from
hunger
,
thirst
,
or
cold
?
But
though
these
things
are
naturally
on
an
equality
with
those
accidental
circumstances
,
and
need
one
and
the
same
humanity
,
yet
they
make
a
distinction
between
these
things
,
because
they
measure
all
things
not
by
the
truth
itself
,
but
by
present
utility
.
For
they
hope
that
those
whom
they
rescue
from
peril
will
make
a
return
of
the
favour
to
them
.
But
because
they
do
not
hope
for
this
in
the
case
of
the
needy
,
they
think
that
whatever
they
bestow
on
men
of
this
kind
is
thrown
away
.
Hence
that
sentiment
of
Plautus
is
detestable
:
—
“ He deserves ill who gives food to a beggar ; For that which he gives is thrown away , and It lengthens out the life of the other to his misery . ”
But perhaps the poet spoke for the actor .
What does Marcus Tullius say in his books respecting Offices ? Does he not also advise that bounty should not be employed at all ? For thus he speaks : “ Bounty , which proceeds from our estate , drains the very source of our liberality ; and thus liberality is destroyed by liberality : for the more numerous they are towards whom you practice it , the less you will be able to practice it towards many . ” And he also says shortly afterwards : “ But what is more foolish than so to act that you may not be able to continue to do that which you do willingly ? ” This professor of wisdom plainly keeps men back from acts of kindness , and advises them carefully to guard their property , and to preserve their money - chest in safety , rather than to follow justice . And when he perceived that this was inhuman and wicked , soon afterwards , in another chapter , as though moved by repentance , he thus spoke : “ Sometimes , however , we must exercise bounty in giving : nor is this kind of liberality altogether to be rejected ; and we must give from our property to suitable persons when they are in need of assistance . ” What is the meaning of “ suitable ? ” Assuredly those who are able to restore and give back the favour . If Cicero were now alive , I should certainly exclaim : Here , here , Marcus Tullius , you have erred from true justice ; and you have taken it away by one word , since you measured the offices of piety and humanity by utility . For we must not bestow our bounty on suitable objects , but as much as possible on unsuitable objects . For that will be done with justice , piety , and humanity , which you shall do without the hope of any return !
This is that true and genuine justice , of which you say that you have no real and life - like figure . You yourself exclaim in many places that virtue is not mercenary ; and you confess in the books of your Laws that liberality is gratuitous , in these words : “ Nor is it doubtful that he who is called liberal and generous is influenced by a sense of duty , and not by advantage . ” Why therefore do you bestow your bounty on suitable persons , unless it be that you may afterwards receive a reward ? With you , therefore , as the author and teacher of justice , whosoever shall not be a suitable person will be worn out with nakedness , thirst , and hunger ; nor will men who are rich and abundantly supplied , even to luxuriousness , assist his last extremity . If virtue does not exact a reward ; if , as you say , it is to be sought on its own account , then estimate justice , which is the mother and chief of the virtues , at its own price , and not according to your advantage : give especially to him from whom you hope for nothing in return . Why do you select persons ? Why do you look at bodily forms ? He is to be esteemed by you as a man , whoever it is that implores you , because he considers you a man . Cast away those outlines and sketches of justice , and hold fast justice itself , true and fashioned to the life . Be bountiful to the blind , the feeble , the lame , the destitute , who must die unless you bestow your bounty upon them . They are useless to men , but they are serviceable to God , who retains them in life , who endues them with breath , who vouchsafes to them the light . Cherish as far as in you lies , and support with kindness , the lives of men , that they may not be extinguished . He who is able to succour one on the point of perishing , if he fails to do so , kills him . But they , because they neither retain their nature , nor know what reward there is in this , while they fear to lose , do lose , and fall into that which they chiefly guard against ; so that whatever they bestow is either lost altogether , or profits only for the briefest time . For they who refuse a small gift to the wretched , who wish to preserve humanity without any loss to themselves , squander their property , so that they either acquire for themselves frail and perishable things , or they certainly gain nothing by their own great loss .
For what must be said of those who , induced by the vanity of popular favour , expend on the exhibition of shows wealth that would be sufficient even for great cities ? Must we not say that they are senseless and mad who bestow upon the people that which is both lost to themselves , and which none of those on whom it is bestowed receives ? Therefore , as all pleasure is short and perishable , and especially that of the eyes and ears , men either forget and are ungrateful for the expenses incurred by another , or they are even offended if the caprice of the people is not satisfied : so that most foolish men have even acquired evil for themselves by evil ; or if they have thus succeeded in pleasing , they gain nothing more than empty favour and the talk of a few days . Thus every day the estates of most trifling men are expended on superfluous matters . Do they then act more wisely who exhibit to their fellow - citizens more useful and lasting gifts ? They , for instance , who by the building of public works seek a lasting memory for their name ? Not even do they act rightly in burying their property in the earth ; because the remembrance of them neither bestows anything upon the dead , nor are their works eternal , inasmuch as they are either thrown down and destroyed by a single earthquake , or are consumed by an accidental fire , or they are over through by some attack of an enemy , or at any rate they decay and fall to pieces by mere length of time . For there is nothing , as the orator says , made by the work of man’s hand which length of time does not weaken and destroy . But this justice of which we speak , and mercy , flourish more every day . They therefore act better who bestow their bounty on their tribesmen and clients , for they bestow something on men , and profit them ; but that is not true and just bounty , for there is no conferring of a benefit where there is no necessity . Therefore , whatever is given to those who are not in need , for the sake of popularity , is thrown away ; or it is repaid with interest , and thus it will not be the conferring of a benefit . And although it is pleasing to those to whom it is given , still it is not just , because if it is not done , no evil follows . Therefore the only sure and true office of liberality is to support the needy and unserviceable .
Notes 1 De Offic., iii. 5.
2 Trinumm., ii. 2. 58.
3 Pro personâ.
4 De Offic., ii. 15.
5 Idoneis. Lactantius uses this word as though its meaning were “the rich;” and though it seems to have passed into this sense in later times, it is plain from the very words of Cicero himself that he uses it of deserving persons who need assistance.
6 [ Luke vi. 32–34. ]
7 De Offic., iii. 17. Solidam et expressam.
8 [De Leg., iii., and De Offic., i. cap. 16.]
9 Populari levitate ducti: an expression somewhat similar to “popularis aura.”
10 Fabulam.
11 Cic., Pro Marcello [Nihil opere et manu factum.]