Opening the library…
Home Bible Corpus Discover You
On Baptism
Tertullian
Chapter 12 About this work An early Latin treatise defending Christian baptism, interpreting its biblical patterns, discussing preparation and administration, and warning against a teacher who rejected water baptism in the church.
Author Tertullian
Date c. AD 198–203
Origin Carthage, North Africa
Genre Theological Treatise Chapter XII.—Of the Necessity of Baptism to Salvation. When , however , the prescript is laid down that “
‹ Chapter 11 Chapter 13 ›without
baptism
,
salvation
is
attainable
by
none
”
(
chiefly
on
the
ground
of
that
declaration
of
the
Lord
,
who
says
,
“
Unless
one
be
born
of
water
,
he
hath
not
life
”
)
,
there
arise
immediately
scrupulous
,
nay
rather
audacious
,
doubts
on
the
part
of
some
,
“
how
,
in
accordance
with
that
prescript
,
salvation
is
attainable
by
the
apostles
,
whom
—
Paul
excepted
—
we
do
not
find
baptized
in
the
Lord
?
Nay
,
since
Paul
is
the
only
one
of
them
who
has
put
on
the
garment
of
Christ’s
baptism
,
either
the
peril
of
all
the
others
who
lack
the
water
of
Christ
is
prejudged
,
that
the
prescript
may
be
maintained
,
or
else
the
prescript
is
rescinded
if
salvation
has
been
ordained
even
for
the
unbaptized
.
”
I
have
heard
—
the
Lord
is
my
witness
—
doubts
of
that
kind
:
that
none
may
imagine
me
so
abandoned
as
to
excogitate
,
unprovoked
,
in
the
licence
of
my
pen
,
ideas
which
would
inspire
others
with
scruple
.
And now , as far as I shall be able , I will reply to them who affirm “ that the apostles were unbaptized . ” For if they had undergone the human baptism of John , and were longing for that of the Lord , then since the Lord Himself had defined baptism to be one ; ( saying to Peter , who was desirous of being thoroughly bathed , “ He who hath once bathed hath no necessity to wash a second time ; ” which , of course , He would not have said at all to one not baptized ; ) even here we have a conspicuous proof against those who , in order to destroy the sacrament of water , deprive the apostles even of John’s baptism . Can it seem credible that “ the way of the Lord , ” that is , the baptism of John , had not then been “ prepared ” in those persons who were being destined to open the way of the Lord throughout the whole world ? The Lord Himself , though no “ repentance ” was due from Him , was baptized : was baptism not necessary for sinners ? As for the fact , then , that “ others were not baptized ” — they , however , were not companions of Christ , but enemies of the faith , doctors of the law and Pharisees . From which fact is gathered an additional suggestion , that , since the opposers of the Lord refused to be baptized , they who followed the Lord were baptized , and were not like - minded with their own rivals : especially when , if there were any one to whom they clave , the Lord had exalted John above him ( by the testimony ) saying , “ Among them who are born of women there is none greater than John the Baptist . ”
Others make the suggestion ( forced enough , clearly “ that the apostles then served the turn of baptism when in their little ship , were sprinkled and covered with the waves : that Peter himself also was immersed enough when he walked on the sea . ” It is , however , as I think , one thing to be sprinkled or intercepted by the violence of the sea ; another thing to be baptized in obedience to the discipline of religion . But that little ship did present a figure of the Church , in that she is disquieted “ in the sea , ” that is , in the world , “ by the waves , ” that is , by persecutions and temptations ; the Lord , through patience , sleeping as it were , until , roused in their last extremities by the prayers of the saints , He checks the world , and restores tranquillity to His own .
Now , whether they were baptized in any manner whatever , or whether they continued unbathed to the end — so that even that saying of the Lord touching the “ one bath ” does , under the person of Peter , merely regard us — still , to determine concerning the salvation of the apostles is audacious enough , because on them the prerogative even of first choice , and thereafter of undivided intimacy , might be able to confer the compendious grace of baptism , seeing they ( I think ) followed Him who was wont to promise salvation to every believer . “ Thy faith , ” He would say , “ hath saved thee ; ” and , “ Thy sins shall be remitted thee , ” on thy believing , of course , albeit thou be not yet baptized . If that was wanting to the apostles , I know not in the faith of what things it was , that , roused by one word of the Lord , one left the toll - booth behind for ever ; another deserted father and ship , and the craft by which he gained his living ; a third , who disdained his father’s obsequies , fulfilled , before he heard it , that highest precept of the Lord , “ He who prefers father or mother to me , is not worthy of me . ”
Notes 1 John iii. 5 , not fully given.
2 See Gal. iii. 27.
3 See Eph. iv. 5.
4 “Volenti,” which Oehler notes as a suggestion of Fr. Junius, is adopted here in preference to Oehler’s “nolenti.”
5 John xiii. 9, 10.
6 Exerta. Comp. c. xviii. sub init.; ad Ux. ii. c. i. sub fin.
7 Matt. xi. 11 , ἐγήγερται omitted.
8 Matt. viii. 24 ; xiv. 28, 29. [Our author seems to allow that sprinkling is baptism, but not Christian baptism: a very curious passage. Compare the foot-washing, John xiii. 8. ]
9 Sæculo.
10 Sæculum.
11 Illoti.
12 Lavacrum. [ John xiii. 9, 10 , as above.]
13 i.e. of being the first to be chosen.
14 Luke xviii. 42 ; Mark x. 52.
15 “Remittentur” is Oehler’s reading; “remittuntur” others read; but the Greek is in perfect tense. See Mark ii. 5.
16 i.e. faith, or perhaps the “compendious grace of baptism.”
17 Matt. ix. 9.
18 Matt. iv. 21, 22.
19 Luke ix. 59, 60 ; but it is not said there that the man did it.
20 Matt. x. 37.